Soles and vagina

When a photographer takes a picture, he tries to get all the good stuff inside the frame, and leave the other stuff outside. Depending on how good the photographer is, he's also able to get a nice composition in the shot, but I have this feeling, that porno-photographers may be thinking too much about tits and twats and not enough about the golden ration and lights properties.

Possible intention

It's a pussy close up, what is there to.. HOLY SHIT, what are those two black things, wich are totally in my face?!?! Her goddamn boot soles, dang it. How could the photographer ignore this!?

The intention is to get pussy all over my laptop screen. I want it so big, it's like I'm really there, plus let me have it magnified! I want to see the pussy in all it's glory!


Why is this wrong?
If I choose to watch a close up of the wrinkled meat curtains, then that's all I want! I don't want anything else, because that could easily distract my attention towards non-sexual stuff.


In this exact shot, the photographer not only manages to get the very unsexy soles in the shot, more than one third of the frame is filled with those construction site safety shoe soles!
The worst part must be the fact that the phtographer has taken the picture with such accurate focus on the womans hairy vagina, that it makes the depth of the shot very intense. 
This meaning that the soles seem like the are right in front of my very face! 

Now the true question is; was this photo supposed to be like this, or was it an accident? Only the man behind the camera will know, but if that's you, please tell me!